Triumph 6: The Faith Of The Word Of God part 2
The Faith of the Word of God part 2
A Summary Study Guide
Shingi Mudyirwa
“Faith is the present continuous state of spoken persuasion.”
— the governing thesis of the teaching
This is a condensed companion to the guide on The Faith of the Word of God, Part 2. It distils the teaching’s thesis, its method, its biblical architecture, and — because the longer guide is a critical study and not merely an exposition — the principal scholarly questions the teaching raises. Scripture is cited briefly in the KJV; the aim is a map the advanced student can hold in view while listening to the teaching.
1. Introduction and Thesis Overview
Part 2 of the Triumph series presses a single practical question: how does the believer overcome? Its answer is that the decisive instrument of triumph is faith, and that faith, rightly understood, is the spoken word of God. The governing definition, repeated as a refrain, is that faith is “the present continuous state of spoken persuasion.”
Shingi first establishes the stakes. Faith is foundational (Hebrews 6:1–2) and indispensable (Hebrews 11:6: “without faith it is impossible to please God”). The gospel itself contains, reveals, and imparts both faith and righteousness: hearing the gospel transmits faith into the human spirit, and the right application of faith’s principle delivers righteousness — producing the miracle of the new birth. Faith is therefore treated not as vague sentiment but as a definite, learnable, repeatable principle.
Thesis. Faith is belief released through the mouth — a sustained, ongoing (present-continuous) state of spoken persuasion. Hence faith “speaks,” works “in the mouth,” and “comes by hearing.”
2. Methodology and Hermeneutics
Three interpretive commitments drive the argument:
- The two-or-three-witnesses canon. Following Deuteronomy 19:15 (and 2 Corinthians 13:1), the definition of faith is established by a triad of testimonies — Paul, Moses, and (in the sequel) Jesus — rather than a single proof-text.
- Original-language philology. Meaning is fixed by appeal to the Greek: pistis (faith), pisteuō (believe), legō (speak), and rhēma (the spoken word) over against logos.
- A pneumatic epistemology. “Spiritual grammar” and “spiritual intelligence” (pneumatikē sophia / synesis / epignōsis; Colossians 1:9; 1 Corinthians 2:10–16; 1 John 2:20) are Spirit-given faculties: the inspired wording “jumps” from the page to the Spirit-sensitised reader, who recovers the definition the text encodes.
Underwriting all of this is the apostolic source. Paul did not receive his gospel from men but “by the apokalypsis of Jesus Christ” (Galatians 1:11–12) — Christ appeared and taught him directly. His formulation in Romans 10 therefore carries dominical authority and demands maximal precision, since the salvation of souls hangs on its accuracy.
3. The Conceptual Core: Belief and Faith
At the centre is a distinction between an inward state and an outward act, drawn from Romans 10:9–10. Belief (pisteuō) is seated in the heart — a persuasion, a “thinking to be true” — necessary, but latent until it is voiced. Faith (pistis) is that belief enacted through confession: on this reading, faith begins when the mouth opens. The rhēma — the specific spoken word — is what frames and reframes a world.
Three exegetical pillars support the definition: “the righteousness which is of faith speaketh” (Romans 10:6 — “faith speaks”); “the word is… in thy mouth” (Romans 10:8 — rhēma, the spoken word); and “with the mouth confession is made unto salvation” (Romans 10:9–10). “Faith cometh by hearing” (Romans 10:17) supplies the present-continuous, sustained aspect. “Heart” here denotes spirit and soul together.
“With the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.” — Romans 10:10 (KJV)
| Belief — pisteuō
|
Faith — pistis
|
|
| Seat
|
The heart — spirit and soul. | The mouth — the spoken word. |
| Nature
|
Inward, cognitive assent — “thinking to be true.” | Outward, sustained, vocal declaration. |
| Status
|
Necessary but latent / inactive.
|
The activation; faith ‘begins’ when the mouth opens. |
| Marker
|
“with the heart man believeth” (Rom. 10:10)
|
“with the mouth confession is made” (Rom. 10:10)
|
4. The Three Witnesses — and the One Set Aside
The biblical architecture is built from corroborating voices, with the third deliberately held in reserve for Part 3 and a fourth set aside.
| Witness | Texts | What it establishes |
| Paul
|
Rom. 10; 2 Cor. 4:13
|
Faith speaks; the mouth–heart anatomy; the “spirit of faith” received by revelation.
|
| Moses
|
Genesis 1
|
“God said” — the faith of God; creation accomplished by speech, with no intervening ‘work.’
|
| Jesus (forthcoming) | Part 3 (Mark 11:22) | The God-kind of faith; deferred to the sequel, where the dominical definition that taught Paul will be heard.
|
| James (set aside) | James 2 | “Faith without works is dead” — treated as a single, uncorroborated witness; the ‘work’ read as the confession of the mouth (not physical deeds). |
The Genesis 1 witness is the boldest stroke: it grounds human faith in God’s own faith. The Spirit broods over the deep and nothing changes — until “God said, Let there be light.” Creation responds to the spoken word, which is precisely what the teaching claims faith does in the believer’s life. On the James question, the teaching answers that Romans 10 names the operative action specifically — confession with the mouth — so the “work” faith requires is the work of speaking, not physical deeds (“not five star jumps”).
5. Critical Scholarly Engagement
What makes the full guide a study rather than a sermon transcript is that it submits the teaching to scholarship. Four questions deserve the advanced student’s attention:
- The subject of Romans 10:6. The clause’s grammatical subject is “the righteousness of faith,” and “speaks” (legei) is the conventional citation formula. “Faith speaks” is a theological extraction — powerful, but layered onto the syntax rather than read straight off it.
- The range of pisteuō. Can “believe” be confined to interior “thinking to be true”? James 2:19 (“the demons believe and tremble”) shows assent alone is not saving, so the narrowing of belief to mental cognition is contestable.
- The rhēma / logos A rigid split between ‘spoken’ and ‘written’ word is exegetically suggestive but lexically soft; in usage the terms overlap heavily (James 1:21 uses logos for the word that saves the soul).
- The genitive of “the faith of God.” The Genesis-1 corroboration leans on reading Mark 11:22 as “have the faith of God” (subjective genitive) rather than “faith in God” (objective). The genitive is genuinely ambiguous, and this is the argument’s load-bearing move.
On its own premises the argument is internally coherent; most of the weight rests on the lexical extractions and the genitive reading. Naming these debates is not to settle them but to let the student hold conviction and scrutiny together.
6. Pastoral and Practical Reflections
Practically, the teaching binds its definition to victory (1 John 5:4: “this is the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith”; John 16:33). It also frames faith as a state generated in advance: in the hospital-ministry illustration, the minister declares the word continuously in private, so that by the bedside the spoken persuasion has already done its work — silence there is the residue of faith already spoken, not its absence.
This sits within a threefold plan of salvation that distributes responsibility: God regenerates the spirit (His sovereign work); Christ will glorify the body at His appearing; and the believer, Spirit-aided, saves the soul by the renewing of the mind (Romans 12:2; James 1:21). Sustained, undoubting confession is part of that renewal — reprogramming the heart from doubt to belief.
Three cautions keep the practice healthy: it should not require denying physical or medical reality; it should preserve the sovereignty and freedom of God rather than reduce faith to a mechanical formula; and it should guard against self-condemnation when an answer is delayed.
7. Conclusion
The full guide does two things at once: it systematises the teaching faithfully — axiom, witnesses, lexicon, method — and it equips the student to test it. The thesis stands restated: faith is the spoken word of God, the present-continuous state of spoken persuasion. Part 3, the witness of Jesus, is anticipated as the completion of the three-witness structure. The advanced reader is left able both to expound the teaching and to interrogate it — which is precisely what doctoral-level study requires.
Glossary of Key Terms
| Term
|
Sense in this teaching
|
| rhēma
|
The specific spoken word / utterance; the word that frames worlds.
|
| logos
|
Word, message, discourse; a broad term overlapping heavily with rhēma.
|
| pistis
|
Faith; here, belief brought to sustained utterance — spoken persuasion.
|
| pisteuō
|
To believe; the heart’s inward persuasion, “thinking to be true.”
|
| homologeō | To confess, to ‘say the same thing’; faith’s verbal enactment.
|
| apokalupsis
|
Unveiling, revelation; the means by which spiritual knowledge is delivered.
|
| Heart
|
Spirit and soul together (mind, will, emotions); the seat of belief.
|
| The faith of God
|
God’s own creative, spoken faith (Genesis 1; Mark 11:22).
|
| Spiritual grammar | The Spirit-discerned significance of Scripture’s deliberate word choice and arrangement. |